------- Comment #30 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr  2008-02-14 10:09 -------
> Hm... I assume you did recompile libgfortran and libstdc++...

In comment #25 I have said:

> I bootstraped without the defines

Anyway, even if the change had solved the problem, I would not have considered
it as a long term fix.
I do not know the technicalities around the *STACK_BOUNDARY stuff to
participate to the discussion, but I think this PR only expose an underlying
bug that should be analyzed.

>From what I understand, if *STACK_BOUNDARY is larger than the size of what is
pushed in the stack, some padding is performed. So the basic question is why
this done for -O2 and not for -Os.

I am currently regtesting libstdc++-v3 rev. 132313, with the defines to confirm
that the failures has not been induced by something else.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34621

Reply via email to