------- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-12 23:19
-------
It looks like simply deleting from dependent_type_p:
/* If there are no template parameters in scope, then there can't be
any dependent types. */
if (!processing_template_decl)
{
/* If we are not processing a template, then nobody should be
providing us with a dependent type. */
gcc_assert (type);
gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (type) != TEMPLATE_TYPE_PARM);
return false;
}
fixes the testcase - so we are probably not setting processing_template_decl
correctly(?). Or is it even correct and the check in the context of
the caller make_typename_type is simply bogus?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jason at redhat dot com,
| |mark at codesourcery dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34950
