------- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-02-08 18:37 -------
Also using a volatile pointer may prevent optimization, so don't use it if
not strictly needed (or at least don't expect optimized code).

Can you try 4.3 as suggested?


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35141

Reply via email to