------- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-08 18:37 ------- Also using a volatile pointer may prevent optimization, so don't use it if not strictly needed (or at least don't expect optimized code).
Can you try 4.3 as suggested?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35141
