------- Comment #7 from vonbrand at inf dot utfsm dot cl 2008-02-06 19:12 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Yes and I just mentioned why this case is incorrect. :) > > Anyways we had an "undocumented extension" (which means it was a bug) in GCC > before 4.2 with this respect.
What is the point of templates and default argument values then? IMVHO it is a bug in the C++ definition if the gcc-4.3 is correct wrt the standard. Oh, well. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35106
