------- Comment #12 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-06 15:10
-------
Looks like last remaining problem is the missed loop invariant motion due to
STACK_REGS hack as in the case of pr23322
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/aux/hubicka/trunk-write/buidl2/gcc$ time
./a.out-nostackregs-hack
real 0m3.637s
user 0m3.588s
sys 0m0.008s
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/aux/hubicka/trunk-write/buidl2/gcc$ time ./a.out-mainline
Does someone have 2.95 around to double check that it didn't perform
significandly better than 3.4?
real 0m4.627s
user 0m4.484s
sys 0m0.016s
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/aux/hubicka/trunk-write/buidl2/gcc$ time ./a.out-gcc-3.4
real 0m4.229s
user 0m3.876s
sys 0m0.004s
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 23322 ***
--
hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Component|tree-optimization |target
Keywords|ra |
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
Summary|[4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression]|[4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression]
|Inlining related regression |x87 load hoisting problem
|for gcc-4.x |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23305
