------- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-05 15:12 ------- > I thought a bit about that recently, and I don't like the idea of having to > support parts of another vendor's extension. The first other idea I had was to > add that STDCALL specification as an extension to the BIND syntax:
If we don't follow !$DEC than I'm in favor of this variant, which one could implement even if one implements !$DEC at some point. > So, my next idea is to provide an compile-time option that would make all > BIND(C) procedures in the compiled file STDCALL I'm really against this; I think this is very confusing and makes it very hard to combine STDCALL with non-STDCALL procedures. #if defined __GFORTRAN__ #define STDCALL STDCALL #else #define STDCALL C #endif subroutine my() bind(STDCALL,name="foo") Or alternatively, though more difficult to CPP: subroutine my() bind(C,attribute="stdcall",name="foo") where one could think of allowing other items from http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Function-Attributes.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34112
