------- Comment #11 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-05 13:31 ------- This testcase is still slower, 4.4s with -O2 and 3.6s with -O2 -fno-inline-small-functions (on i386). I wondered if the patch counting frequency of calls crossed helped here. My slowdown is smaller than what reported by Jakub, so perhaps it did partially, but we are still having regression here.
Honza -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23305
