------- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-05 00:42 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > We don't, however, handle the case where we mark volatile the other variable > involved in the equivalence:
OK, Richard Maine and Steve Lionel confirmed that equivalence shouldn't interfere with the volatile attribute, so I'll submit my patch when 4.4 branches. Or is it 4.3 material? (it certainly is of limited impact, and fixes a wrong-code bug, but it's not a regression). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35037
