------- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-28 10:25 ------- Ian, the testcase would be new16.C after removing CHANGE_DYNAMIC_TYPE_EXPR stuff (to fix this PR). Or do you propose to keep CHANGE_DYNAMIC_TYPE_EXPR in 4.3 (which looks redundant with PR33407) and just hack it up to avoid doing it if operator new second argument is a reference to pointer rather than a pointer?
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34862