------- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-01-28 10:25 -------
Ian, the testcase would be new16.C after removing CHANGE_DYNAMIC_TYPE_EXPR
stuff
(to fix this PR).  Or do you propose to keep CHANGE_DYNAMIC_TYPE_EXPR in 4.3
(which looks redundant with PR33407) and just hack it up to avoid doing it
if operator new second argument is a reference to pointer rather than a
pointer?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34862

Reply via email to