------- Comment #18 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-27 19:54 ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Hi Kaveh. One problem I can see is that we are dealing with special member > functions, like constructors and assignment operators
Ah, I guess you can't make those static. > Can you see anything > wrong with the straightforward implementation of idea per the attached > patchlet? If it looks ok to you, it would be matter of doing the same for the > other 2 files... It looks like you reversed the checks for the problematic cases when you see __PIC__. I wonder whether this will work on darwin which still binds locally for pic code. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-01/msg00495.html The regtester might barf on this change, I don't have darwin to check. If it does, maybe instead you simply nuke the problematic cases when you see __PIC__. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26099
