------- Comment #18 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-26 11:58 ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Probable patch posted in 31610 > See my remark there -> if we can understand it, I would feel reassured but, if not, lets go with your version of the patch and keep this PR open as an "error-recovery" (there does not appear to be a "dunno-whats-going-on" key word:) ) bug.
Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34946
