------- Comment #7 from igodard at pacbell dot net 2008-01-25 22:35 -------
Yes, it has always been understood that this code is invalid. The report is
about the quality of the diagnostic that was given, not whether a diagnostic
should be given. The diagnostics (three of them for one error) refer to a
location a *long* way from the actual error, and with no obvious (to me anyway)
syntactic relationship to the actual problem.
--
igodard at pacbell dot net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20478
