------- Comment #8 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-20 13:38 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I think that having -Wall clobber -Wstrict-overflow in this way is confusing. > This isn't reversing the setting of the option, it's changing its level. >
Ian, should the above testcase actually give a warning? I am testing revision 131656 and I cannot get a warning no matter what value of -Wstrict-overflow or optimisation level I try. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32102
