------- Comment #57 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2008-01-18 02:10 ------- Subject: Re: Inordinate compile times on large routines
lucier at math dot purdue dot edu wrote: > ------- Comment #56 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2008-01-18 01:38 > ------- > gcc is now 5-6 times faster than it was nearly two years ago when this was > first reported; many changes have made significant improvements in cpu time. > > But Steven Bosscher's patch from December still improved things more on this > test case. > > In particular, on 12/20/2007, without the patch, CPU time from > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14799 > > was > > TOTAL : 300.21 19.16 319.52 > 778432 kB > > After Steven Bosscher's patch > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34400#c28 > > it was > > TOTAL : 210.97 15.80 226.88 > 778432 kB > > and today it's > > TOTAL : 281.08 18.03 299.41 > 776514 kB > > Would it still be a good idea to apply Steven's patch? > > > the plan is to apply all of the patches, they each deal with a different problem and the improvement should be additive. kenny -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854
