------- Comment #1 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2008-01-13 03:10 ------- Confirmed. Here's a slightly simplified testcase: -----------bar.h------------ typedef struct { unsigned : 16; unsigned : 16; } foo; -----------bar.c------------ #include <stdio.h> #include <bar.h>
foo bar(unsigned i) { printf("bar: i is %u.\n",i); foo myfoo; return myfoo; } -------------foo.cc------------ #include <stdio.h> #include <bar.h> extern "C" foo bar(unsigned int); int main(void) { foo myfoo; unsigned i = 3; printf("foo: i is %u.\n",i); myfoo = bar(i); return 0; } ------------------- tmp/g> gcc -I. -c bar.c tmp/g> g++ -I. -o foo foo.c bar.o tmp/g> ./foo foo: i is 3. bar: i is 1289971520. Something appears to go wrong when calling the extern "C" function... This is a wrong-code regression on valid code. W. -- bangerth at dealii dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bangerth at dealii dot org, | |mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot | |org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Keywords| |wrong-code Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-01-13 03:10:24 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33810