------- Comment #26 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-10 23:58 ------- Mark, wrt. the release, I recommend this PR shouldn't be a blocker. The problem is old and is currently latent on the trunk, where it is only exposed with non-default options (-fno-inline-small-functions).
Obviously, the problem is that the hash of reg 66 is changed after a hash table element is created for it in the bucket for the original hash. I have no idea yet whether this is expected, or if not, what is going wrong. Messing with CSE at this stage may be more dangerous than accepting the status quo. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31944
