------- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-03 16:43 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> The problem is that cshift0's target-independent function type says that the
> SHIFT and DIM arguments are integers, rather than pointers to integers.
Indeed. Thanks Richard! The dump has:
integer(kind=8) D.879; [...]
D.879 = (integer(kind=8)) dimmy;
_gfortran_cshift0_8 (&parm.0, &parm.2, &C.877, D.879);
while the libgfortran has:
void cshift0_8 (gfc_array_char *ret, const gfc_array_char *array,
const GFC_INTEGER_8 *pshift, const GFC_INTEGER_8 *pdim)
The problem seems to be in trans-expr.c's gfc_conv_missing_dummy or (less
likely) in the way it is called in trans-intrinsic.c's
gfc_conv_intrinsic_function_args.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
GCC build triplet|hppa-unknown-linux-gnu |
GCC host triplet|hppa-unknown-linux-gnu |
GCC target triplet|hppa-unknown-linux-gnu |
Keywords| |wrong-code
Last reconfirmed|2008-01-01 23:07:28 |2008-01-03 16:43:32
date| |
Summary|FAIL: |FAIL:
|gfortran.dg/optional_dim_2.f|gfortran.dg/optional_dim_2.f
|90 |90: FE vs library argument
| |missmatch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34387
