------- Comment #4 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-12-26 20:18 ------- Sorry about a bit of confusion on my part :( In this specific testcase there is no miscompilation either, of course. Whether the DLV problem is ultimately the same, I don't know at the moment (it seems so), but in any case I don't think the library is doing anything non-conforming, here, because, as I said, we are certainly copying output iterators everywhere (was already like this in v2) and doing it in one place more, before the assignment as in this testcase, doesn't seem special at all.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34595
