------- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-12-17 22:53 -------
The first part of this PR is fixed with:

Index: gcc/fortran/expr.c
===================================================================
*** gcc/fortran/expr.c  (revision 130811)
--- gcc/fortran/expr.c  (working copy)
*************** find_array_element (gfc_constructor *con
*** 1026,1035 ****
        }

        /* Check the bounds.  */
!       if (ar->as->upper[i]
!         && (mpz_cmp (e->value.integer, ar->as->upper[i]->value.integer) > 0
!             || mpz_cmp (e->value.integer,
!                         ar->as->lower[i]->value.integer) < 0))
        {
          gfc_error ("index in dimension %d is out of bounds "
                     "at %L", i + 1, &ar->c_where[i]);
--- 1026,1039 ----
        }

        /* Check the bounds.  */
!       if ((ar->as->upper[i]
!            && ar->as->upper[i]->expr_type == EXPR_CONSTANT
!            && mpz_cmp (e->value.integer,
!                        ar->as->upper[i]->value.integer) > 0)
!               ||
!         (ar->as->lower[i]->expr_type == EXPR_CONSTANT
!            && mpz_cmp (e->value.integer,
!                        ar->as->lower[i]->value.integer) < 0))
        {
          gfc_error ("index in dimension %d is out of bounds "
                     "at %L", i + 1, &ar->c_where[i]);

The second is due to the gfc_error at expr.c(check_restricted):2495

There is some attribute that 'i' has which should make it an exception - I just
do not quite see what it is right now.

Paul


-- 

pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|2007-12-15 10:08:30         |2007-12-17 22:53:09
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34476

Reply via email to