------- Comment #34 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2007-12-17 16:01 ------- Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] bad interaction between DF and SJLJ exceptions
ludovic at ludovic-brenta dot org wrote: > ------- Comment #33 from ludovic at ludovic-brenta dot org 2007-12-17 15:35 > ------- > Here are the numbers; there is a spectacular improvement, but 4.3 is still an > order of magnitude slower than 4.2: > > With df_hack3 alone: > real 1m5.705s > user 1m5.184s > sys 0m0.412s > > With df_double_queue_worklist alone: > real 4m8.383s > user 4m6.055s > sys 0m0.636s > > With df_hack3 and df_double_queue_worklist: > real 1m6.834s > user 1m6.024s > sys 0m0.376s > > With df_hack2 and df_hack3: > real 0m54.194s > user 0m53.511s > sys 0m0.324s > > With df_hack2, df_hack3 and df_double_queue_worklist: > real 0m54.132s > user 0m53.691s > sys 0m0.372s > > > can you send us a time report for this so we can see if we have changed who the bad actors are? by "this" i mean all three patches together. kenny -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34400
