------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-16 21:27 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > I disagree with Andrew's Comment #4. Once we implement a feature in the > compiler, users should reasonably expect it to be correct. We cannot > simultaneously say "Look, we have exciting new C++0x features!" and "Oh, you > found a bug? That's not very serious, since it's just a new C++0x feature."
I seriously disagree, this is not a regression in that code never was supported before and really C++0x support should not block the release just because people feel this is an important feature of 4.3.0. Also another thing is that we have some ODR violations in libstdc++ that the libstdc++ folks have not replied to me about yet. See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2007-08/msg00032.html and some others. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33943
