------- Comment #5 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-12 17:44 ------- It's legitimate to use -maltivec without -mabi=altivec unless linking against objects that were compiled with -mabi=altivec, so adding the option to vect.exp is merely hiding the problem. Is there a reason why only these particular tests would need the AltiVec ABI, and only with -fno-tree-scev-cprop?
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34437
