------- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-04 19:39 ------- Alex's patch has not been reverted and it seems it was agreed on to keep it for 4.3 and only try something different, like Richard's patches, for 4.4. If so, this isn't a 4.3 regression, because 4.2 was AFAIK eating even more memory, so this should be just a target 4.4 non-regression memory saving request.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34255
