------- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-04 14:02 ------- Note to the attached test case: One needs to remove some superfluous "!!" comments from nan_2.f90.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34333
[Bug fortran/34333] if(nan == nan) wrongly returns TRUE, when nan is a parameter
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org Tue, 04 Dec 2007 06:02:41 -0800
- [Bug fortran/34333] New: if(nan == nan) wro... burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/34333] if(nan == nan) wron... burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/34333] if(nan == nan) wron... burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/34333] if(nan == nan) wron... burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/34333] if(nan == nan) wron... patchapp at dberlin dot org
- [Bug fortran/34333] if(nan == nan) wron... burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/34333] if(nan == nan) wron... burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/34333] if(nan == nan) wron... burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
