------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-30 21:56 -------
>This bug presented here is likely the same as Bug #27557, but this test case
>does not involve a non-POD type.
T is a non POD type. It has a non trivial copy constructor and/or constructor.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 27557 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34303
