------- Comment #4 from sam at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-30 09:54 ------- Of course, you should read "reference" instead of "dereference" in the previous comment.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34290
------- Comment #4 from sam at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-30 09:54 ------- Of course, you should read "reference" instead of "dereference" in the previous comment.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34290