------- Comment #37 from oshima at eng dot niigata-u dot ac dot jp  2007-11-10 
14:58 -------
Created an attachment (id=14524)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14524&action=view)
A proposed patch for bootstrapping GCC-4.2.2 on Interix 6

The attached patch is to bootstrap GCC 4.2.2 on Interix 6.0, based on Martin's.
The compilers bootstrapped successfully with the following config.
../gcc-4.2.2/configure   --verbose \
    --prefix=/dev/fs/D/ohshima/OpenFOAM/interix/gcc-4.2.2 \
    --with-gmp=/dev/fs/D/ohshima/OpenFOAM/interix/gcc-4.2.2 \
    --with-mpfr=/dev/fs/D/ohshima/OpenFOAM/interix/gcc-4.2.2 \
    --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --enable-threads=posix \
    --disable-win32-registry --disable-libssp --with-stabs \
    --enable-fully-dynamic-string --enable-shared \
    --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran

However the failure rates of the testsuites (make -f check), as indicated
below, are considerably higher compared to other platforms. Moreover, the
numbers of failures slightly vary across the test runs. I'd be grateful if
anyone can look into and revise the patch.

                === g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes            12703
# of unexpected failures        67
# of unexpected successes       2
# of expected failures          65
# of unresolved testcases       42
# of untested testcases         30
# of unsupported tests          150

                === gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes            40371
# of unexpected failures        525
# of unexpected successes       1
# of expected failures          109
# of unresolved testcases       2
# of untested testcases         245
# of unsupported tests          405

                === gfortran Summary ===

# of expected passes            14296
# of unexpected failures        1484
# of expected failures          5
# of unsupported tests          80

                === libstdc++ Summary ===

# of expected passes            2936
# of unexpected failures        84
# of expected failures          13
# of unsupported tests          158

With kind regards,
Takuya


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15212

Reply via email to