------- Comment #16 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-09 23:59 ------- (In reply to comment #15) > I wrote this code originally, and I agree with your analysis.
But regtesting doesn't agree with my analysis... in case of common with bind(c,name="..."), this patch hampers the diagnosis of commons with the same name but different labels. I've tried hard to get it rolling that way, because I agree it's cleaner, but I couldn't. I'll propose a different approach (a hack, to avoid writing twice the same combination of name and binding label) to the list when it finishes regtesting. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30285
