------- Comment #3 from cppljevans at suddenlink dot net 2007-10-31 18:49
-------
When that following main is used instead of the one posted earlier,
the error no longer occurs.
<-- cut here --
int
main(void)
{
typedef gram_tree<vars> gt;
gt::productions prods;
#define INST_SEQ
#ifdef INST_SEQ
gt::expr_sequence inst_seq;
#endif
prods[vars::e]=prods[vars::e] >>
#ifdef INST_SEQ
inst_seq
#else
prods[vars::e]
#endif
;
return 0;
}
>-- cut here --
IOW, the pt.c insource comment mentioned in my first post
really means what it says, i.e. the above code instantiates
the outer class, expr_sequence, and the ice no longer occurs.
Maybe the gcc_assert that's in pt.c on line 6651
and that was mentioned in my first post should be removed?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33959