------- Comment #17 from geoffk at geoffk dot org 2007-10-30 18:31 ------- Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] typeinfo name referenced in ... defined in discarded section
On 30/10/2007, at 9:53 AM, gcc at magfr dot user dot lysator dot liu dot se wrote: >>> If that is the case, what should typeid(reference to base of >>> anonymous class >>> instance) in another module return? >> >> The same thing it does now, which I believe is the typeinfo of the >> base class. > > I follows the standard, so if base is polymorphic it returns the > typeinfo > object for the actual type and if if base is nonpolymorphic it > returns the > typeinfo object for base. > > Could the requirements be aligned? I believe that the compiler now does what the standard says and can continue to do so whether the typeinfo is local or not. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33871
