------- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr  2007-10-19 21:21 -------
After reverting the changes made in revision 129400 (otherwise revision 129491
+ gfortran patches), the gcc testsuite gives:

Target: powerpc-apple-darwin8

        === gcc tests ===

Schedule of variations:
    unix

XPASS: gcc.dg/20020103-1.c scan-assembler-not LC[0-9]
FAIL: gcc.dg/initpri1.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/memcpy-1.c scan-tree-dump-times nasty_local 0
FAIL: gcc.dg/ssp-2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-4.c scan-tree-dump Replaced \(char\) .*with 
XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/update-threading.c scan-tree-dump-times Invalid sum 0
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-31d.c scan-tree-dump-times
vectorization not profitable 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-31d.c scan-tree-dump-times
vectorized 1 loops 0
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-68d.c scan-tree-dump-times
vectorization not profitable 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-68d.c scan-tree-dump-times
vectorized 1 loops 0
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/section-anchors-pr27770.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/section-anchors-vect-69.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/section-anchors-vect-69.c scan-tree-dump-times Alignment of
access forced using peeling 4
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/parity-1.c scan-assembler popcntb
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/popcount-1.c scan-assembler popcntb

        === gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes            46942
# of unexpected failures        13
# of unexpected successes       2
# of expected failures          166
# of untested testcases         35
# of unsupported tests          419
/opt/gcc/darwin_buildw/gcc/xgcc  version 4.3.0 20071019 (experimental) (GCC) 

This can be compared to

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-10/msg00869.html


-- 

dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |amodra at bigpond dot net
                   |                            |dot au


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33812

Reply via email to