------- Comment #3 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-19 20:27 ------- In fact at some point I'd like to open a discussion about what we consider a *regression*. I mean, *regression* means to me, roughly, "something used to work and now all of a sudden doesn't work anymore, we must quickly fix it!". However, we mark PRs as [4.1/4.2/4.3 regression], and that very often means something different! Because we often mark like that issues which date back to 3.4 or even 3.3! And that because we want only to mention active branches. Overall, I think this approach may be very confusing. Another, smaller, issue is that in case of ICEs on invalid should be more clear from the PR whether it happens only in development builds, or not: the latter are definitely less serious, IMO, at least now that we have "confused by earlier errors..."
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32252
