------- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-18 16:27 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Your code is undefined. You have multiple assignments to pow_tmp without
> intervening sequence points.
>
Do you think it could be interesting to collect these kind of reports as
potential testcases for an improved Wsequence-point (PR16202)?
The only thing to be done is (apart from closing it as invalid) add it as
blocking bug 16202.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33809
