------- Comment #13 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-11 11:14
-------
> Revision 128957 causes this regression.
There is a suspect non-documented hunk in the commit:
* reload1.c (compute_use_by_pseudos): Change DF_RA_LIVE
usage to DF_LIVE usage.
--- trunk/gcc/reload1.c 2007/10/02 12:47:13 128956
+++ trunk/gcc/reload1.c 2007/10/02 13:10:07 128957
@@ -548,7 +548,7 @@
if (r < 0)
{
/* reload_combine uses the information from
- DF_RA_LIVE_IN (BASIC_BLOCK), which might still
+ DF_LIVE_IN (BASIC_BLOCK), which might still
contain registers that have not actually been allocated
since they have an equivalence. */
gcc_assert (reload_completed);
@@ -1158,10 +1158,7 @@
if (! frame_pointer_needed)
FOR_EACH_BB (bb)
- {
- bitmap_clear_bit (df_get_live_in (bb), HARD_FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM);
- bitmap_clear_bit (df_get_live_top (bb), HARD_FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM);
- }
+ bitmap_clear_bit (df_get_live_in (bb), HARD_FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM);
/* Come here (with failure set nonzero) if we can't get enough spill
regs. */
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33676
