------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-10-05 17:05 ------- Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] TER breaks some inline-asm code (again)
On 5 Oct 2007 10:58:10 -0000, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ------- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-05 10:58 ------- > If __builtin_expect is the only problem, then we could certainly allow > __builtin_expect to be replaceable (perhaps add a few other builtin calls > that never result in any actual calls, like __builtin_object_size). well those should be foldded before exand now so i am not worried about them. --Pinski -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33619
