------- Comment #3 from andrew dot stubbs at st dot com 2007-09-28 16:00 ------- I'm not a GCC expert, but that patch looks like it will silently change the behaviour of the compiler when -pedantic is not given.
I would suggest that the first parameter should either be a regular, non-pedantic warning, or else should honour the default as requested by the user (as a language extension). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31988
