------- Comment #6 from debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2007-09-25 07:15 ------- comparing 4.2 20070902 with 4.2 20070925 + plus the proposed patch, I see two regressions:
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/vla4.C (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/other/unused1.C scan-assembler
(string|ascii?)z?\\t"class2("|\\\\\\\\000)
Currently checking 20070925 without the proposed patch.
Matthias
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33381
