------- Comment #2 from simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-23 19:49 ------- I've done tests with the current mainline and I wonder if this PR is still "valid"...
We report an error for the following three cases: 1. Multiple specializations: template <typename T> class A {}; template<> class A<int> {}; template<> class A<int> {}; 2. Multiple explicit instantiations: template <typename T> class B {}; template class B<int>; template class B<int>; 3. Specialization following an explicit instantiation: template <typename T> class D {}; template class D<int>; template<> class D<int> {}; The fact that we accept an explicit instantiation after a specialization is due to DR 259. -- simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |simartin at gcc dot gnu dot | |org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30857