------- Comment #4 from raeburn at raeburn dot org 2007-09-19 17:27 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> I'm not convinced by the explanation in the comment. A pointer to array *is*
> compatible with the corresponding const pointer type; -Wcast-qual may apply
> too, but that's not exhibited in the test case.
That's what I originally thought, but now (as I explained in a comment to
33076) I think there's a quirk of the standard that makes them not compatible.
I'd be happy to be shown to be wrong -- but can you provide specific references
to the standard to refute my argument in 33076?
--
raeburn at raeburn dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |raeburn at raeburn dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16602
