------- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-19 13:46 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > > Pedantically this is not a bug. If an omp sentinel doesn't have the desired > > form, it should be handled as a normal comment.
I cannot find anything about this in the OpenMP spec; I think the behaviour of the compiler is undefined as this is invalid syntax. I don't find anything which indicates that this has to/should/would be treated as comment. (In reply to comment #7) > Only a warning, please. Not an error for code that is, strictly speaking, > valid. I am actually in favour of an error unless someone can points out the part of the spec which implies this is valid or a pice of code which shows that it would be sensible to accept "!OMP$&" + garbage as comment. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33445
