------- Comment #3 from jbeulich at novell dot com 2007-09-19 09:39 -------
Isn't this the same as 16602 (which I don't really understand why it was
rejected as invalid)? Also, if this *is* invalid, then what proper mechanism
does one have to express what is intended here? And why does similar code
compile warning free in C++?
--
jbeulich at novell dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jbeulich at novell dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33076
