------- Comment #2 from yuri at tsoft dot com 2007-09-18 22:58 ------- Warning should be issued in this case as well. Since this isn't an expected behavior to ignore "n++".
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33483
------- Comment #2 from yuri at tsoft dot com 2007-09-18 22:58 ------- Warning should be issued in this case as well. Since this isn't an expected behavior to ignore "n++".
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33483