------- Comment #4 from ubizjak at gmail dot com  2007-09-07 10:42 -------
Similar to PR26449, which was _not_ fixed properly (so please don't mark this
one as a duplicate). The problem that was misteriously fixed for one testcase
just resurfaced again. Some info is also in PR32123.

Proposed patch that I'm going to re-test is at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-05/msg01865.html


-- 

ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |26449, 32123
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |ubizjak at gmail dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|2007-09-07 09:57:54         |2007-09-07 10:42:23
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33329

Reply via email to