------- Comment #4 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-09-07 10:42 ------- Similar to PR26449, which was _not_ fixed properly (so please don't mark this one as a duplicate). The problem that was misteriously fixed for one testcase just resurfaced again. Some info is also in PR32123.
Proposed patch that I'm going to re-test is at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-05/msg01865.html -- ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |26449, 32123 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |ubizjak at gmail dot com |dot org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2007-09-07 09:57:54 |2007-09-07 10:42:23 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33329