------- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-05 19:19
-------
Created an attachment (id=14159)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14159&action=view)
Proposed patch
Sorry for the breakage. Could you try the attached patch? It seems to
fix the problem on a cross compiler. I think it's the right fix because
(a) the rest of expand_binop_directly is careful to pass unmodified operands
when the expander does not specify a mode, and
(b) that's what we'd do when not optimising.
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33306
