------- Comment #2 from alduc1 at free dot fr 2007-08-30 15:22 -------
I do not think it is the same bug 11751.
For example:
*p++ = *p + 1.0;
*p++ = *p + 1.0;
works. But
*p++ = (float) floor((double) *p + 0.5);
*p++ = (float) floor((double) *p + 0.5);
does not work (with float). It is not only the ++ operator that cause the
problem.
Why when it is compiled with gcc 3.2.3 there is no problem ?
Why the equivalent code
*p = (float) floor((double) *p + 0.5);
p++;
*p = (float) floor((double) *p + 0.5);
p++;
works ?
I do not understand "no sequence point between *p++ and *p" ?
--
alduc1 at free dot fr changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|DUPLICATE |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33248
