------- Comment #5 from nikolay at totalviewtech dot com 2007-08-24 13:15
-------
This is not fixed neither in 4.1.0 nor in any later version. The problem is
that DIE for static foofoo was indeed produced, but produced in wrong place.
<2><260>: Abbrev Number: 7 (DW_TAG_subprogram) --- Constructor declaration
DW_AT_external : 1
DW_AT_name : A
DW_AT_decl_file : 1
DW_AT_decl_line : 16
DW_AT_declaration : 1
<1><27f>: Abbrev Number: 10 (DW_TAG_subprogram) --- Broken declaration
DW_AT_sibling : <2bc>
DW_AT_specification: <260>
DW_AT_decl_line : 22
DW_AT_inline : 0 (not inlined)
.....
<2><2a7>: Abbrev Number: 13 (DW_TAG_variable)- this is where foofoo was emited
DW_AT_name : foofoo
DW_AT_decl_file : 1
DW_AT_decl_line : 28
DW_AT_type : <3a1>
DW_AT_location : 5 byte block: 3 c0 86 4 8 (DW_OP_addr: 80486c0)
<1><2c1>: Abbrev Number: 15 (DW_TAG_subprogram) -- real constructor declaration
DW_AT_sibling : <2fd>
DW_AT_abstract_origin: <27f>
DW_AT_low_pc : 0x8048474
DW_AT_high_pc : 0x80484ed
DW_AT_frame_base : 0 (location list)
<2><2ee>: Abbrev Number: 17 (DW_TAG_lexical_block) -- this is the scope, where
foo and all other variables should be defined.
DW_AT_low_pc : 0x8048495
DW_AT_high_pc : 0x80484eb
<3><2f7>: Abbrev Number: 18 (DW_TAG_variable) --- this is supposed to be
"iii"
DW_AT_location : 2 byte block: 91 74 (DW_OP_fbreg: -12)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
So dwarf producer is clearly confused and emits static foofoo in wrong broken
subprogram declaration. Instead it should emit it inside lexical block <2ee>
--
nikolay at totalviewtech dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |nikolay at totalviewtech dot
| |com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33044
