[Bug tree-optimization/32949] suboptimal address generation for int indices on 64-bit targets

[amonakov at gmail dot com]

------- Comment #2 from amonakov at gmail dot com  2007-08-22 10:13 -------
> *************** scev_probably_wraps_p (tree base, tree s
> *** 2969,2977 ****
>        2032, 2040, 0, 8, ..., but the code is still legal.  */
> 
>     if (chrec_contains_undetermined (base)
> !       || chrec_contains_undetermined (step)
> !       || TREE_CODE (step) != INTEGER_CST)
> !     return true;
> 
>     if (integer_zerop (step))
>       return false;
> --- 2969,2975 ----
>        2032, 2040, 0, 8, ..., but the code is still legal.  */
> 
>     if (chrec_contains_undetermined (base)
> !       || chrec_contains_undetermined (step))
> 
>     if (integer_zerop (step))
>       return false;

Zdenek, isn't 'return true' missing here?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32949