------- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-18 01:25 ------- (In reply to comment #11) > The main concern on the recent LKML thread appeared to be code size rather > than > speed. One should note this only helps CISC based processors, it will not help stuff like PowerPC anyways. It is better to remove volatile in 95% of the places where the kernel uses it anyways than fix this bug.
(In reply to comment #12) > Please accept my apologies for skipping that step -- I wasn't aware of this. > Should I replicate this bug at Ubuntu, or is this strictly advice for future > bug submissions? It would be better next time unless you can test it on a FSF GCC source release/SVN. Thanks, Andrew Pinski -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33102
