------- Comment #2 from paulmck at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2007-08-18 00:11 ------- Hmmm... I wasn't asking for volatile to be atomic, just for it to avoid generating unnecessary code.
-- paulmck at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|DUPLICATE | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33102