------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 17:02 ------- Well 1.1 is not directly represented in double precission which is why you get that "weird" number.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33067
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org Tue, 14 Aug 2007 10:03:05 -0700
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 17:02 ------- Well 1.1 is not directly represented in double precission which is why you get that "weird" number.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33067